Hello Dallman and *,
Am 2009-03-26 03:04:22, schrieb Dallman Ross:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:18:30AM +0100, Holger Wahlen wrote:
That's ok if there's just
Reply-To: someone(_at_)example(_dot_)com
but not for
Reply-To: Some Person <someone(_at_)example(_dot_)com>
(assuming that only the address itself is supposed to be the file name),
or is it?
Ah. Good point. I was thinking of something like Delivered-To:,
which on my system always has only an email address after one space
char. Actually, looking in some recent good mail of mine, the
only Reply-To: fields I find have an address and, usually, <surround-
brackets>, but no Gecos name or other text. But though I haven't
looked at the RFCs, I suspect a Gecos name there is OK.
While looking into the RFCs ist seems, that for Reply-To: apply the same
as for Envelope-To: and Delivered-To:, meaning only an E-Mail address is
allowed, but it is not clea, whether RFC requires the surounding <>
which are in Message-Id: is madatory.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/> Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/> Apt. 917
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/> 50, rue de Soultz
Jabber linux4michelle(_at_)jabber(_dot_)ccc(_dot_)de 67100
Strasbourg/France
IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ #328449886 Tel. FR: +33 6 61925193
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail