Greg Trounson wrote:
Hi, and thanks for your reply,
I implemented both of your suggested changes above, and so far at least
they appear to have worked. That's great, though a little troubling, as
I'm still at a loss as to what was causing some messages to slip through
before.
I will need to do further tweaking, as the FROM line had the [\(_dot_)(_at_)]
directive there to match for example both sender1(_at_)my(_dot_)domain and
sender2(_at_)division(_dot_)my(_dot_)domain(_dot_) That could have been what
was tripping it up,
though it still looks to be a valid egrep expression.
You keep changing the criteria and you haven't put up the actual recipe
along with a verbose log of a failure. Doing the latter is the first
thing to do if you want anything except casual help.
There is nothing about
^FROM(_dot_)*[\(_dot_)(_at_)]my\(_dot_)domain\(_dot_)com
which is appropriate to match sender1(_at_)my(_dot_)domain and
sender2(_at_)division(_dot_)my(_dot_)domain
It'd be a good idea to create a sandbox so you can test your recipes against
known messages. Take a look at Sean's method:
http://www.professional.org/procmail/sandbox.html
Rich
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)de
http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail