I’ve been on the proemial list for the better part of that 20 years. It
certainly has slowed down the last few years (not many of us left getting our
mail on Unix servers any more, let alone one’s that aren’t running something
like Zimbra), but there is a message every few months.
I wouldn’t say Proemial “isn’t supported” any more. It’s just not actively
developed any more, as there isn’t much to add to it, or to fix. It’s not used
as much as it once was, so there are fewer and fewer bugs found to fix. I’m
sure if someone did find one, someone (with more coding knowledge than I) would
write a patch and submit it, and somewhere along the way it would make it to
the various package maintainers for Red Hat, Debian, etc, if not in the
“official” distribution (I don’t know who the maintainer of the package is
these days).
On Aug 6, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Julian H. Stacey <jhs(_at_)berklix(_dot_)com>
wrote:
After using procmail for about 20 years I signed up for this list a
few months ago and your's is the first message I remember seeing.
It's a nice quiet, but useful list, (I too regard it as official as
much as anything ever is), I suspect there's a lot of us on it,
just not a lot of traffic normaly, as detail we need is usually in
the manual, as it's mature software, "just works" :-).
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich
Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable.
http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)de
http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail
--
Andrew Edelstein
andrew(_at_)pure-chaos(_dot_)com
https://andrew.pure-chaos.com/
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)de
http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail