Eric S. Raymond writes:
Justin Mason <jm(_at_)jmason(_dot_)org>:
A DNSBL of "spammer domains".
Wouldn't this just replicate the known problems with blocklists?
I think the current problems with blocklists are that spammers have found
a way to change addresses very quickly, through use of open proxies.
This, at least, would bring them back to a state whereby their servers
must have a static set of IPs, with a predefined list of domains that
refer to those IPs; in other words, the speed with which they can change
to a new IP-domain combo, as one is blocklisted, is greatly reduced.
I reckon it'll bring us back to the "old days" of BLs -- when they were
much more effective, and spammers much more traceable.
--j.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
pgpWqm5bdyZCq.pgp
Description: PGP signature