you're right. fixed. thanks.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0100, Roy Badami wrote:
|
| > "Softdeny" means MTAs SHOULD reject the message using a 450
| > transient failure reply code. The shorthand for "softdeny" is "-".
|
| What does this achieve? Doesn't this just mean that the mail will
| bounce after 5-7 days with softdeny, as opposed to bouncing
| immediately with deny?
|
| The version of softdeny described on the website, where the message is
| tagged with a Received-SPF header, but not rejected at the SMTP level,
| sounds more useful in terms of the sunrise strategy...
|
| Or am I missing something?
|
| -roy
|
|
|
| -------
| Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
| Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
| Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
| To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
| please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡