spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3 nits with draft RFC

2003-10-24 05:50:02
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:22:08AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
- 2.3.3: %t should use 4-digit timezones, there's a few TZs which use
  sub-hour granularity.  really.

I'm not sure why the description in DNS needs those subsitutions anyway?
Isn't it up to the SMTP+SPF software to produce meaningful messages
unassisted?

I can see how it would help customer support for the sender domain helpdesk,
but I'm not sure this complexity is necessary?

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper     | "In the name of sheer pity, won't someone operate on
cap(_at_)capsi(_dot_)com | Chairman Arafat and put that poor cancer into a 
cleaner
www.capsi.com | environment? -- Rick Brookhiser

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§ÅvÂ¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com

Attachment: pgpd8ZXT3G2xS.pgp
Description: PGP signature