I'm willing to bet that you could find web based dns providers that only
allow A records, should we just reduce down the spf standard and say
that it must work with only A records as well?
I think you completely failed to address the original motivation. Find me a
DNS provider that conforms to the following requirements, and I'll use it
for all of my 'non-critical' DNS:
1) Extremely-low or zero cost per domain name.
2) Permit a reasonable number of domains to be hosted (say <=100, I'm not
looking to abuse someone's service).
3) Reasonable update cycles (for example GraniteCanyon takes 2-3
days--unreasonable).
4) Supports TXT records.
5) Conforms to all other 'obvious' requirements (A records, timely response
to queries, etc.)
I cannot find one.
Marc
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡