In <237699020(_dot_)20040309122757(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com> Dave Crocker
<dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> writes:
My "problem" is the observation that proposals which require wide-scale
change to an existing semantic find themselves trying to overcome a
particularly massive barrier to adoption, and rarely overcome it.
I heard a fair amount of this "semantic redefinition" thing at the
BOF. All the references were very vague about what terms were being
redefined by who and how the terms were being changed.
Can you be more specific about what your observed problem is?
-wayne