spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: This company will be glad of SPF

2004-03-19 09:48:51
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 16:33 +0000, Lyndon Eaton wrote:
More instances of these should really highlight the need for something
like SPF! And fast

They don't have an SPF record so people using only SPF are still
accepting the offending mail, presumably.

OTOH some people are _already_ rejecting this mail without needing to
wait for anything new. For example, this is what happens if you try to
send it to me...

220-pentafluge.infradead.org ESMTP Exim 4.30 Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:47:01 +0000
220 Be gentle with me
helo me
250 pentafluge.infradead.org Hello me [2002:c35c:f9fc::1]
mail from:<martyn(_dot_)cattermole(_at_)assetz(_dot_)com>
250 OK
rcpt to:<dwmw2(_at_)infradead(_dot_)org>
550-Verification failed for <martyn(_dot_)cattermole(_at_)assetz(_dot_)com>
550-Called:   212.53.64.41
550-Sent:     RCPT TO:<martyn(_dot_)cattermole(_at_)assetz(_dot_)com>
550-Response: 550 unknown user
550 Sender verify failed


-- 
dwmw2


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>