spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: This company will be glad of SPF

2004-03-19 10:23:02
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Lyndon Eaton wrote:

They don't have an SPF record so people using only SPF are 
still accepting the offending mail, presumably.
... 
OTOH some people are _already_ rejecting this mail without 
needing to wait for anything new. For example, this is what 
happens if you try to send it to me...

220-pentafluge.infradead.org ESMTP Exim 4.30 Fri, 19 Mar 2004 
16:47:01 +0000 220 Be gentle with me helo me 250 
pentafluge.infradead.org Hello me [2002:c35c:f9fc::1] mail 
from:<martyn(_dot_)cattermole(_at_)assetz(_dot_)com>
250 OK
rcpt to:<dwmw2(_at_)infradead(_dot_)org>
550-Verification failed for <martyn(_dot_)cattermole(_at_)assetz(_dot_)com>
550-Called:   212.53.64.41
550-Sent:     RCPT TO:<martyn(_dot_)cattermole(_at_)assetz(_dot_)com>
550-Response: 550 unknown user
550 Sender verify failed

How does that work?

They are contacting an MX server for assetz.com, and checking if the
purported user really exists.

Another approach is to 'guess' when SPF returns 'none'.  Guess is a heuristic
that pretends the sending domain has a generic SPF record.  For example,
Since assetz.com doesn't publish an SPF, you might pretend that
they published "V=spf1 a ptr mx -all".  More generous versions accept
IPs in the same /24 subnet as an IP derived from A, PTR, and MX.

-- 
                        Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
      Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
      "Very few of our customers are going to have a pure Unix
      or pure Windows environment." - Dennis Oldroyd, Microsoft Corporation


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>