On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote:
| We are having _really_ good results with SPFv1 so far.
| 2 months ago our e-mail was nearly unusable for the spam.
|
| Fully 1/2 of our inbound e-mail has been SPF rejectable for the
| past few days, with no detectable false positives (most of it I would
| have manually filtered by subject or To:). Of the rest, about
| 10% have had SPF pass records, which are allowing me to be stricter
| with my spam filtering.
Could you share with us any detailed stats? A breakdown of what rules
exactly caused rejects would be really helpful. Specifically the HELO
stuff as others have suggested, etc.