On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 08:14, Daniel Taylor wrote:
SPF as it currently sits is incredible, and further deployment
of it will only improve matters. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE be
careful about making changes to it now.
last week I asked for a macro extension to support more header data
in exists: macros. I would like to retract that request. A web-service
to modify a sender's listings can be referred to in the rejection
information, including anything besides envelope return address in a
rejection message might become a communication vector.
Too many ISPs do not currently pass on 5xx rejection text. What can
be done about this? As the explanations become meaningful, they will
have to catch on and upgrade one hopes.
--
david nicol