SPF Discuss (thread)
the problem of regime change,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/05/31
- Re: the problem of regime change, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/05/31
- RE: the problem of regime change, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/31
- RE: the problem of regime change, Michel Py, 2004/05/31
- RE: the problem of regime change, Michel Py, 2004/05/31
- RE: the problem of regime change, SPF_0x1b, 2004/05/31
Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights),
Michael R. Brumm,
2004/05/30
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Greg Connor, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Koen Martens, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Greg Connor, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Greg Connor, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Shevek, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/31
- Re: Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/31
RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once),
Michel Py,
2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Marcie Alana Lovell, 2004/05/30
- SV: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/30
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Ryan Malayter, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Chris Bartram, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), administrator, 2004/05/31
what license do you want to see?,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/05/28
- Re: what license do you want to see?, wayne, 2004/05/29
- Re: what license do you want to see?, Jasper Wallace, 2004/05/29
- Re: what license do you want to see?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/29
- Re: what license do you want to see?, Richard Parker, 2004/05/29
- Re: what license do you want to see?, Matthew Mastracci, 2004/05/31
- RE: what license do you want to see?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/05/28
- RE: what license do you want to see?, SPF_0x1b, 2004/05/28
- RE: what license do you want to see?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/05/29
- RE: what license do you want to see?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/05/29
- RE: what license do you want to see?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/05/29
- RE: what license do you want to see?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/05/29
What about reverse source path?,
Stuart D. Gathman,
2004/05/27
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/05/27
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/27
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, wayne, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, wayne, 2004/05/28
- RE: What about reverse source path?, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/28
- RE: What about reverse source path?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, David Brodbeck, 2004/05/28
- Microsoft IIS and Exchange Support, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/05/29
- RE: What about reverse source path?, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/30
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/30
- RE: What about reverse source path?, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/31
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/31
- RE: What about reverse source path?, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/31
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/30
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/31
- Patent concerns [Was: What about reverse source path?], Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/28
- Re: What about reverse source path?, wayne, 2004/05/28
some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing,
wayne,
2004/05/26
- Re: some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/05/26
- Re: some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/05/27
- SV: Re: some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/28
- Re: SV: Re: some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/28
- XML enables nested error handling, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/28
- Re: XML enables nested error handling, Aredridel, 2004/05/28
- Re: XML enables nested error handling, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/28
- Re: XML enables nested error handling, Greg Connor, 2004/05/29
- Extensibility, and error handling. Could SPF lose to XML over it?, Greg Connor, 2004/05/30
- XML Poll (Please respond only once), George Mitchell, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Roman Festchook, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Terence Way, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Steven G. Willis, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Geoffrey T. Dairiki, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), David, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Andrew Brampton, 2004/05/30
- XML Poll (Please respond only once), Roger Moser, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Lloyd Zusman, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/05/30
- Regarding XML, Aredridel, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Scott Taylor, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), spf, 2004/05/30
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Ken, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), wayne, 2004/05/30
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Karsten Elfenbein, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Alain Knaff, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), spf, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), wayne, 2004/05/30
- SPF Usage vs. CID Usage, Was Re: XML Poll, George Mitchell, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Larry Smith, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), dave wanta, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Scott Taylor, 2004/05/30
- XML: Pros and Cons, was Re: XML Poll, George Mitchell, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, dave wanta, 2004/05/30
- RE: was XML Poll, Ian Peter, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, Alan Hodgson, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, Theo Van Dinter, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, Terence Way, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/05/31
- Re: was XML Poll, Koen Martens, 2004/05/31
- Re: was XML Poll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/05/30
- Re: was XML Poll, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/31
- Re: was XML Poll, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/05/31
- Re: was XML Poll, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/31
- Re: was XML Poll, Alain Knaff, 2004/05/31
- Re: In defence of XML, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/30
- Re: In defence of XML, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/30
- Re: In defence of XML, Roger Moser, 2004/05/30
- Re: In defence of XML, wayne, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Richard Pitt, 2004/05/30
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Michael R. Brumm, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Mark C. Brown, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Andy Bakun, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/30
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Seth Goodman, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Jim Hill, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Neil Brown, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Andrew Church, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Weldon Whipple, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Alan Madill, 2004/05/30
- THIS POLL IS USELESS, Greg Connor, 2004/05/31
- Answers to new, more detailed poll (Was: Re: THIS POLL IS USELESS), Alain Knaff, 2004/05/31
- With regard to Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights) (was: THIS POLL IS USELESS), Koen Martens, 2004/05/31
- Re: THIS POLL IS USELESS, Andrew Church, 2004/05/31
- Re: THIS POLL IS USELESS, George Mitchell, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Mark, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), JBritain, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), George Mitchell, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Chris Drake, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), frank, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), list+spf-discuss, 2004/05/31
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Clifford Hammerschmidt, 2004/05/31
- XML unification proposal, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/31
- Re: Extensibility, and error handling. Could SPF lose to XML over it?, wayne, 2004/05/30
- Re: XML enables nested error handling, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/29
- RE: XML enables nested error handling, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/05/29
- XML enables nested error handling, Roger Moser, 2004/05/29
- RE: XML enables nested error handling, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/05/29
- Re: SV: Re: some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing, James Couzens, 2004/05/28
- Re: SV: Re: some stats on SPF and C-ID publishing, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/28
Article in Security UPDATE newletter,
Roy Snell,
2004/05/26
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Chris Drake, 2004/05/26
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Roy Snell, 2004/05/26
- Re[2]: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Chris Drake, 2004/05/27
- OT: spammers, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, ernst, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Alain Knaff, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Larry Smith, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, wayne, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, spf, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Andy Lester, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Larry Smith, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Christian Joergensen, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, gmc, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/27
- Re: OT: spammers, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/27
- RE: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Michel Py, 2004/05/26
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/26
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Graham Murray, 2004/05/26
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, lst_hoe01, 2004/05/27
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, David Brodbeck, 2004/05/27
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, lst_hoe01, 2004/05/27
- Re[2]: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Chris Drake, 2004/05/27
- Re: Re[2]: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, lst_hoe01, 2004/05/27
- Re: Re[2]: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, list+spf-discuss, 2004/05/27
- Re: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Carl Hutzler, 2004/05/27
- RE: Re[2]: Article in Security UPDATE newletter, Michel Py, 2004/05/27
SV: RCPT TO: rejecting,
Lars Dybdahl,
2004/05/25
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, George Mitchell, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- domainkeys, Chris Drake, 2004/05/27
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Mark, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Lou Katz, 2004/05/26
- RE: RCPT TO: rejecting, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Chris Drake, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, David Brodbeck, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, George Mitchell, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, David Brodbeck, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, George Mitchell, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, David Brodbeck, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Alain Knaff, 2004/05/26
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Chris Drake, 2004/05/26
- Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Jesse Gordon, 2004/05/26
- Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Mark, 2004/05/27
- Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/30
- Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/26
- the philosophy of CBV, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/26
- Re: the philosophy of CBV, Chris Drake, 2004/05/27
- Re: the philosophy of CBV, David Nicol, 2004/05/28
- Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, David Brodbeck, 2004/05/27
- Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting, Greg Connor, 2004/05/30
- Re: SV: RCPT TO: rejecting, Guillaume Filion, 2004/05/28
Logo aka branding aka identity issue,
Chris Drake,
2004/05/21
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/05/24
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, david nicol, 2004/05/25
- Re[2]: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Chris Drake, 2004/05/25
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, DJ Coster, 2004/05/26
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Brad Glore, 2004/05/26
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, DJ Coster, 2004/05/26
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, David Nicol, 2004/05/26
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Nigel Metheringham, 2004/05/27
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Andy Bakun, 2004/05/26
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Greg Connor, 2004/05/26
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, James Couzens, 2004/05/26
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Jason Gurtz, 2004/05/28
- Re: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/29
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Michel Py, 2004/05/25
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Michel Py, 2004/05/26
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Michel Py, 2004/05/26
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Michel Py, 2004/05/26
- RE: Logo aka branding aka identity issue, Michel Py, 2004/05/29
Brainstorming RFROM variants,
Mark Shewmaker,
2004/05/21
- RE: Brainstorming RFROM variants, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/05/21
- Re: Brainstorming RFROM variants, david nicol, 2004/05/21
- RE: Brainstorming RFROM variants, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/21
- Tarpitting and SpamCannibal (was Re: Brainstorming RFROM variants), Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/22
- Re: Tarpitting and SpamCannibal (was Re: Brainstorming RFROM variants), Carl Hutzler, 2004/05/22
- Re: Tarpitting and SpamCannibal (was Re: Brainstorming RFROM variants), Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/22
- RE: Tarpitting and SpamCannibal (was Re: Brainstorming RFROM variants), Seth Goodman, 2004/05/22
- Re: Tarpitting and SpamCannibal (was Re: Brainstorming RFROM variants), Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/22
smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions,
Jeff Taylor,
2004/05/21
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/21
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Chuck Mead, 2004/05/21
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Jeff Taylor, 2004/05/22
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Chuck Mead, 2004/05/22
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Jeff Taylor, 2004/05/24
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, lst_hoe01, 2004/05/25
- RCPT TO: rejecting, Chris Drake, 2004/05/25
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Jeff Taylor, 2004/05/24
- Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/22
The New SPF: introducing RFROM,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/05/20
- The New SPF: overall outline, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, James Couzens, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, James Couzens, 2004/05/20
- PTR Name SPF checking, william(at)elan.net, 2004/05/21
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Guillaume Filion, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, James Couzens, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, william(at)elan.net, 2004/05/20
- The New SPF: overall outline, Roger Moser, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, James Couzens, 2004/05/20
- The New SPF: overall outline, Roger Moser, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline (xml), Andy Bakun, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline (xml), Guillaume Filion, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline (xml), Andy Bakun, 2004/05/20
- Re: The New SPF: overall outline, Jasper Wallace, 2004/05/20
- The New SPF: overall outline, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Daniel Taylor, 2004/05/21
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/05/21
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, wayne, 2004/05/21
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/21
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Mark, 2004/05/21
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Guillaume Filion, 2004/05/22
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Justin Mason, 2004/05/23
- Putting the PRA into the Received headers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/24
- Putting the PRA into the Received headers, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: Putting the PRA into the Received headers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/24
- Re: Putting the PRA into the Received headers, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/05/25
- RE: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/26
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Daniel Taylor, 2004/05/26
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Justin Mason, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Greg Connor, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami, 2004/05/24
- Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/05/24
- RE: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/25
- SV: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/20
let's get rid of SRS,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, spf, 2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Shaun T. Erickson, 2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Christopher Chan, 2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, George Mitchell, 2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Mark, 2004/05/19
- let's get rid of SRS, Roger Moser, 2004/05/19
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/19
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Neil Brown, 2004/05/19
- let's get rid of SRS, Roger Moser, 2004/05/19
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Tony Finch, 2004/05/20
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/20
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Nigel Metheringham, 2004/05/20
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/05/20
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/05/20
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Daniel Taylor, 2004/05/21
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, wayne, 2004/05/21
- SV: let's get rid of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/19
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Shaun Bryant, 2004/05/19
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, Greg Wooledge, 2004/05/19
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Ryan Malayter, 2004/05/19
- SV: let's get rid of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/20
- SV: let's get rid of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/20
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Ryan Malayter, 2004/05/20
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Jeremy Pullicino, 2004/05/20
- Re: let's get rid of SRS, administrator, 2004/05/20
- RE: let's get rid of SRS, Ryan Malayter, 2004/05/20
SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total,
Lars Dybdahl,
2004/05/11
- Re: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, wayne, 2004/05/11
- SV: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/11
- SV: SV: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/11
- SV: SV: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/11
- SV: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/12
- SV: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/12
- SV: SV: Recursion limit of 20 include/redirects total, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/12
HELO vs. envelope checks,
Tony Finch,
2004/05/06
- Re: HELO vs. envelope checks, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/05/06
- Re: HELO vs. envelope checks, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/05/06
- Re: HELO vs. envelope checks, Greg Connor, 2004/05/16
- HELO vs. envelope checks, Roger Moser, 2004/05/17
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/17
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Greg Connor, 2004/05/17
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/18
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Greg Connor, 2004/05/21
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/23
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Greg Connor, 2004/05/23
- What does RFROM give us that forwarder whitelisting doesn't?, Alain Knaff, 2004/05/24
- Re: What does RFROM give us that Sender: doesn't?, david nicol, 2004/05/25
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/24
- Re[2]: HELO vs. envelope checks, Chris Drake, 2004/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: HELO vs. envelope checks, Mark, 2004/05/23
- RE: HELO vs. envelope checks, Seth Goodman, 2004/05/23
- SV: HELO vs. envelope checks, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/24
- SV: Re[2]: HELO vs. envelope checks, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/05/24