Re: The New SPF: overall outline

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 15:50, Roger Moser wrote:
> > Number 3 is the worst, most Windows and some Unix servers allready have
> > an XML parser, but there are a lot of smaller SMTP servers that do not.
> > An XML parser is a fat cat, the expat tarball is 290 KB while qmail's
> > tarball is 215 KB.
> The XML parser that I wrote for SPF to parse Microsoft's record is less than
> 2 kB binary code.
Does your parser fully implement XML?  If so please share a url.  If
not, I can see problems with using such a parser.

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://gpg.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E0396B3

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-200405.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part