spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: In defence of XML

2004-05-30 14:22:10
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 16:51, Tim Meadowcroft wrote:

[snip]

distortion of its operational characteristics. But the records must also be 
kept simple and readable enough that a sys admin can SEE broadly what a 
record says, and can INSPECT the difference between 2 different records 
without having to resort to external tools.

  Consider that in order determine the MX record(s) of a particular
domain, all I need to type is 'host -t mx somedomain.com'.  As a
sysadmin, I wouldn't particularly appreciate need to type 'host -t spf
somedomain.com | big-honkin-xml-editor' just to be able to grok what is
essentially a reverse-mx record.  Also consider that I may be doing this
DNS query on a machine that is not my mail server, but a stripped down
box on my DMZ that (intentionally) has no XML utilities.  Why should I
install XML tools on *any* system to do simple DNS queries?
  Yes, I know SPF records are a bit more complex than simple MX records,
but I should be able to parse them with my eyes as easily as I can other
DNS records.
-- 
-Paul Iadonisi
 Senior System Administrator
 Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
 Ever see a penguin fly?  --  Try Linux.
 GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>