Re: In defence of XML

I have following great idea for those who would like to parse the email
policy as XML:

We store the email policy in SPF format, and for XML lovers I will write an
SPF to XML converter.
(I would not claim any patent for my invention of the 'apparatus' for
converting from SPF to XML).

Roger

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: was XML Poll, (continued) Re: was XML Poll, Terence Way Re: was XML Poll, Lars B. Dybdahl Re: was XML Poll, Koen Martens Re: was XML Poll, Frank Ellermann Re: was XML Poll, Andy Bakun Re: was XML Poll, Lars B. Dybdahl Re: was XML Poll, Andy Bakun Re: was XML Poll, Alain Knaff Re: In defence of XML, Tim Meadowcroft Re: In defence of XML, Paul Iadonisi Re: In defence of XML, Roger Moser <= Re: In defence of XML, wayne Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Richard Pitt RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Michael R. Brumm Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Mark C. Brown Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Andy Bakun Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Tim Meadowcroft RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Seth Goodman Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Jim Hill Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Neil Brown

Previous by Date:	Re: what license do you want to see?, Daniel Quinlan
Next by Date:	Should SPF be Frozen or Extensible? (XML insights), Michael R. Brumm
Previous by Thread:	Re: In defence of XML, Paul Iadonisi
Next by Thread:	Re: In defence of XML, wayne
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]