Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM

spf-discuss

Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM

2004-05-24 15:16:02

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


BTW, if I recall correctly, last time I checked, the only MTA/MUA combo to
use what the Caller-ID doc said was the behaviour regarding
Sender/Resent-* headers, was Exchange/Outlook. ;)   

So independent verification would be a good idea.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFAsnQhQTcbUG5Y7woRAhqOAJ4/lzSnrsGEGpqS3ppIXJGItJhj1gCePT2T
3ffFj2gC98Hw8E13hp0pVDg=
=7uCq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Putting the PRA into the Received headers, (continued) Re: Putting the PRA into the Received headers, Meng Weng Wong Re: Putting the PRA into the Received headers, Roy Badami Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Paul Iadonisi Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Meng Weng Wong Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Jeffrey Goldberg RE: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Seth Goodman Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Daniel Taylor Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Justin Mason <= Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Greg Connor Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Meng Weng Wong RE: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Seth Goodman SV: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Lars Dybdahl

Previous by Date:	Re: smtpd_recipiant/client_restrictions, Jeff Taylor
Next by Date:	Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami
Previous by Thread:	Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami
Next by Thread:	Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM, Roy Badami
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]