spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The New SPF: introducing RFROM

2004-05-24 19:54:38
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:30:38AM +0100, Roy Badami wrote:
| >>>>> "Greg" == Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org> writes:
| 
|     Greg> Actually Sender: is not as obscure
| 
| I'll grant that it's more widely used that Resent-*
| 
| But in a world where most MUA's submit by (unauthenticated) SMTP, and
| don't even allow the user to separately configure the header and
| envelope sender, I'll maintain that the ability to specify multiple
| identities in the headers is "relatively obscure".
| 

In my ideal scenario, a user would submit via SMTP AUTH to the MTA,
and the authenticated address would be in the RFROM.  That would be
independent of what the MUA submitted in the return-path.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>