Re: let's get rid of SRS2004-05-19 17:31:21Roger Moser (Roger(_dot_)Moser(_at_)pamho(_dot_)net) wrote: The sender signs a hash of the envelope sender (plus time stamp) by using a private RSA key and in the SPF record publishs the pulic key needed to check the signature. For example: "v=spf1 a mx ses:...public_key... -all" meaning "all mail from us has a signed envelope sender and here is the method to check it". In addition to the legal issue raised by a previous reply, there is a time synchronization issue when it comes to the timestamps. How much drift do you propose to allow between the client and the server before the signature check fails due to clock skew? Apart from those objections, it seems promising. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." greg(_at_)wooledge(_dot_)org | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | ------- Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/ Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/ Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-200405.txt Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/ To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
|
|