<document type=humor><paragraph><sentence kind=statement>
<word><letter>I</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>a</letter><letter>m</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>o</letter><letter>p</letter><letter>p</letter><letter>o</letter><letter>s</letter><letter>e</letter><letter>d</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>t</letter><letter>o</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>u</letter><letter>s</letter><letter>i</letter><letter>n</letter><letter>g</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>X</letter><letter>M</letter><letter>L</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>f</letter><letter>o</letter><letter>r</letter></word><whitespace/>
<word><letter>S</letter><letter>P</letter><letter>F</letter></word><whitespace/>
</sentence></paragraph></document>
George Mitchell wrote:
Before we waste any more time on XML, could we take a quick poll on
whether we want to use it at all? I request all of the members of this
list respond (once) to the list in this thread, stating simply whether
you believe the SPF specification should include the use of XML. I'll
start off:
I am opposed to the use of XML in conjunction with SPF.
-- George Mitchell
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
The Inbox Event at the Marriott San Jose features SPF.
June 2: Email Accountability Symposium (free)
June 3: SPF Strategy BOF (free) where industry will coordinate deployment
timeline
Times: 6:30pm - 8pm, both sessions. http://www.inboxevent.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com