Meng Weng Wong wrote:
The question of patents and licensing has been one of the
many lightning rods surrounding the SPF/CallerID merger.
George Webb at Microsoft will meet with the MS attorneys
next week. He has asked for our input.
If you guys have specific patent-related language that you
want to see them use, please provide it in full, and I will
pass it on to him.
Suggestions of "oh, it should be RF" are easy to make, but
if you could provide several kilobytes of legalese, that
would be even better.
GPL compliance should be a goal of this language.
If any patent rights are granted in the license, a licensee should be
able to sub-license the patent rights, assuming they comply with the
terms of the license.
The worst part of the current CID license is that you need to get the
patent rights from Microsoft each time, rather than the person
developing the CID-implementation.
Matt.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
The Inbox Event at the Marriott San Jose features SPF.
June 2: Email Accountability Symposium (free)
June 3: SPF Strategy BOF (free) where industry will coordinate deployment
timeline
Times: 6:30pm - 8pm, both sessions. http://www.inboxevent.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
matt.vcf
Description: Vcard