spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Answers to new, more detailed poll (Was: Re: THIS POLL IS USELESS)

2004-05-31 02:11:42
begin  Monday 31 May 2004 10:47, Greg Connor quote:
 * Opposed to any XML, due to bloat, patent/IP issues, hate MS

Yes.


, other (list any that apply)

            - no clear advantage (as you admit yourself, syntactical
            extensibility is not enough; we need semantics as well)
            - installed base of SPFv1 vs XML.

 * Let the receivers implement both, so that the publishers may publish
either one.

No.

Indeed, doing this would still incur the bloat in the SPF parsers
(which would need to support both, in order for this proposal to make
sense), although, admittedly, it would solve DNS record bloat (because
under this scenario XML records would be the exception, rather than
the norm)

 * Use XML only

No


Alain