spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Moving forward

2004-10-01 11:35:44
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, wayne wrote:

In <e941453904100109286e4ed3ac(_at_)mail(_dot_)gmail(_dot_)com> "Anne P. 
Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>" 
<shedevil(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:

Is there any reason that it can't be ready for submission at the end
of next week?

You mean besides the fact that both draft authors have explicitly said
that they do not want to standardize SPFv1?

It does not matter if they want it, the editor's job is to recognize the 
consensus and move forward with it. And I've never seen such a clear 
consensus on MARID on in fact on most other WGs I'm on.

Moving forward with drafts for SPFv1 will piss Microsoft off.  Meng
and Craig Spiezle of Microsoft are going to be discussing SPFv2 at the
next ISPCon next month. Both Meng and folks from MS have stated that
"we" are working together and moving forward with SenderID, including
the PRA.
What is wrong with some people? Can't they recognize a snake or are they 
waiting for it to bite them in the a** ?

And Meng should realize that if he wants support of SPF community he should
act as representative of it and not in opposition to majority opinion.

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>