From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com>
But Meng has already spoken for the SPF community by saying that we
would go forward with the PRA.
If a person is a member of the SPF community by virtue of being slightly
active on this list - then it appears that Meng has *not* represented the
SPF community. PRA was rejected by a reasonably obvious majority, and calls
to go forward with SPF-classic were also in the majority.
In the circumstances, the SPF community has been left with
no choice but to withdraw its support for the PRA scope.
Again, Meng has already spoken for the SPF community and continues to
support the PRA.
Is it going to become necessary to take a vote on what the spf community
really wants in order to clear the air ?
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492