Re: Moving forward

wayne <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com> writes:

I don't think anyone else can step forward and get an RFC created.
The IESG will almost certainly reject any I-D that tries to
standardize the SPF records that doesn't come from Meng, Mark, and
Microsoft.


Surely not Microsoft? They had nothing to do with SPF classic, so
have no right to be associated with any I-D which standardises it.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Moving forward, (continued) Re: Moving forward, wayne Re: Moving forward, jpinkerton RE: Moving forward, John Glube Re: Moving forward, wayne Re: Moving forward, Mark Lentczner Re: Moving forward, wayne RE: Moving forward, John Glube Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Moving forward, Jim Hill Re: Moving forward, wayne Re: Moving forward, Graham Murray <= Re: Moving forward, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com> Re: Moving forward, Michael Hammer Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Moving forward, Michael Hammer Re: Re: Moving forward, wayne Source of the drafts? (Was: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Source of the drafts? (Was: Moving forward, wayne Re: Moving forward, Frank Ellermann Re: Moving forward, John Hinton

Previous by Date:	RE: Moving forward, John Glube
Next by Date:	Re: Moving forward, wayne
Previous by Thread:	Re: Moving forward, wayne
Next by Thread:	Re: Moving forward, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]