spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Moving forward

2004-10-01 13:14:26
In <4161abab(_dot_)547082046(_at_)mid(_dot_)rdns(_dot_)org> Jim Hill 
<spf-0408(_at_)mx(_dot_)rdns(_dot_)org> writes:

wayne in <x4hdpeb9ld(_dot_)fsf(_at_)footbone(_dot_)midwestcs(_dot_)com>:

You mean besides the fact that both draft authors have explicitly said
that they do not want to standardize SPFv1?

Authors - editors, call 'em what you like - can only document. If
they're unwilling, someone else will step forward.

I don't think anyone else can step forward and get an RFC created.
The IESG will almost certainly reject any I-D that tries to
standardize the SPF records that doesn't come from Meng, Mark, and
Microsoft.



-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>