RE: SES (was moving on from MARID)

spf-discuss

RE: SES (was moving on from MARID)

2004-10-01 14:03:04

On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:


I think that designated IPs work great for the first hop, and should
be kept.


(1) it's the second (or third) hop in most email deployments

(2) what's the point in solving less than a half of the problem?

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
SOUTH EAST FITZROY: NORTH OR NORTHEAST 4 OR 5. FAIR. GOOD.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
SES (was moving on from MARID), Seth Goodman RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), John Glube RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), Stuart D. Gathman RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), Tony Finch <= Re: SES (was moving on from MARID), Meng Weng Wong Re: SES, wayne Re: SES, James Couzens Re: SES, william(at)elan.net Re: SES, James Couzens Re: SES, Meng Weng Wong SES, Roger Moser Re: SES, James Couzens Re: SES, Theo Schlossnagle RE: SES, Seth Goodman

Previous by Date:	Re: Moving forward, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>
Next by Date:	Re: Moving forward, Michael Hammer
Previous by Thread:	RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), Stuart D. Gathman
Next by Thread:	Re: SES (was moving on from MARID), Meng Weng Wong
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]