On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 20:13, wayne wrote:
It is my understanding that the folks on the CLEAR mailing list feel
that SES is out of scope. It has been discussed some on the MASS
mailing list, but I'm not sure if it is going to be in scope there
either.
This isn't the impression I garnered.
I tracked through all IETF-CLEAR traffic back to Monday when I
subscribed and apparently the list began and there isn't a single post
even mentioning SES, even in passing.
Just what have you read that has left you with this feeling?
And for the record and in direct contradiction to what Wayne has said:
From:
Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
To:
John Glube <jbglube(_at_)sympatico(_dot_)ca>,
'CLEAR' <ietf-clear(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Subject:
RE: [ietf-clear] Re. CLEAR Charter
Date:
Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:55:26 -0700
However, it has been suggested by at least one individual
that SES would be beyond scope of the CLEAR charter.
I'm not sure where John got this from but as best I can tell it wasn't
from a post to the IETF-CLEAR mailinglist, and FURTHERMORE his post
wasn't until Saturday 4:44AM (Received: from sb7.songbird.com
(sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11)
with ESMTP id i92BjRaX028012; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 04:45:47 -0700) so surely
your understanding didn't come from that post.
I am not sure this is correct. Perhaps the BATV authors can
take a look at the issue and provide some guidance.
1. Is there an Internet-Draft that provides a specification to
use for comparison with BATV? There needs to be.
2. Can the SES folks initiate the comparison discussion, so that
we can look for interesting differences?
We (SES) have been discussing the differences between what the SES
specification for some time now and it still remains under discussion.
The appearance of SES on the IETF-CLEAR mailinglist is no coincidence as
Dave Crocker and others have been privy to its development again for
some time now.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|-|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part