Re: SES

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:00:04 -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote
> The sendmail tests are comparing it against a no-op milter.  The 
> point Theo was making was that precisely because you do a lot more 
> than just transiting mail, those benchmarks aren't very 'real 
> world'. Once you add in virus/spam scanning to the mix, the 
> additional hit of throwing DK into the mix is very very minimal. 
It all adds up, though.  Each additional delay adds a cost and increases the
chances of a timeout.