----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Moser" <Roger(_dot_)Moser(_at_)rama(_dot_)pamho(_dot_)net>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:25 AM
Subject: [spf-discuss] SES
Doesn't this use quite some CPU resources which the receiver has to pay?
Better would be if the sender (spammer) had to do the heavy calculations.
Do you see the conflict of this?
You parenthetically stated spammer. Well, spammer or not, the scheme would
have to apply across the board, specially because you don't know what the
sender is yet.
And realistically, it would be the SPAMMER would be more likely to be NOT
doing any calculation at all.
Which leaves you back to square one:
How do you deal with current compatibility issues?
Yes, this applies to all ideas.
Sincerely,
Hector Santos, CTO
Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
305-431-2846 Cell
305-248-3204 Office