You said: "You can't use SPF to reject even with a -all, because it'll
reject too much legitimate email."
Could you explain why? Your link did not, it just agreed with you.
If I say don't accept mail from an address, or a list of addresses, then
don't accept it. That is what "-" is for. If not, please explain.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Tony
Finch
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 5:54 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be
kept out
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Frank Ellermann wrote:
what do you think SPF does without a -all ?
You can't use SPF to reject even with a -all, because it'll reject too
much legitimate email.
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mailsig/mail-archive/msg00286.html
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
FAEROES SOUTHEAST ICELAND: NORTHERLY 7 TO SEVERE GALE 9, DECREASING 5,
BECOMING VARIABLE 4 IN SOUTHEAST ICELAND LATER. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD
&NBSP;.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com