On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote:
What we should do is ask that Wayne and Mark work together on -01 draft
that will then be the one submitted for EXPERIMENTAL RFC.
If they can not agree on something among themselve privately, perhaps they
can then bring it to attention of this group and we'll try to resolve it
and if its not possible after brief discussion, then make list of all
unresolved differences into a poll and ask people to say which one they
prefer in next draft.
As long as I and others are given a) proper time to evaluate b) proper
audience to contest and c) fair consideration I am more then happy with
what you just proposed.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
^ ( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|+|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part