spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: purely dual-format approach

2004-10-30 12:34:18
In <4183DA93(_dot_)51C(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann 
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:

Roger Moser wrote:

No problem: v=spf1 sc=s1 m1 sc=s1,s2 m2 m3 sc=s2 m4

Please don't say v=spf1, these ideas don't work with existing
implementations.

Really?

What existing SPF implementations don't allow this?

Note:  I've studied as many as I've been able to get my hands on, I
know of none.  Maybe you know more about existing SPF implemenations
than I do, but if so, that would take some work.

The ban on multiple modifiers in a single SPF record is a creation of
the new SPF-classic spec as defined in draft-lentczner-spf-01, rather
than any of the old SPF-classic specs, such as spf-draft-200406.txt.
In fact, in the last old SPF-classic spec (200406), it explicitly said
that multiple accredit= modifiers could be used.



-wayne