spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Handling of -all

2005-02-24 13:28:29
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Julian Mehnle wrote:

This kind of nihilism is the best means to kill off any standard right
away before it has a chance to take off.  Incompetence cannot be an excuse
for lowering security standards.

If a domain owner publishes "-all", it is everyone's absolute right to
assume that this is what he meant.  Otherwise, what "now we can begin
taking SPF records seriously" switch date would you suggest?

And if the sender *did* make a mistake, the best and friendliest way 
to let him know is to REJECT the message early (i.e. at a border MTA)
so he'll get a nice DSN from his own MTA or MSA.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>