RE: Handling of -all

Guy [pobox(_at_)watkins-home(_dot_)com] wrote:

I think the point was that many people will be just confused by
"example.com is not authorized to use address [1.2.3.4]"


A proper SPF fail error message would read:

  forger.biz [1.2.3.4] is not allowed to send mail with the domain
  "forged.org" in the sender address.  Contact 
<postmaster(_at_)forged(_dot_)org>.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Handling of -all, (continued) RE: Handling of -all, Julian Mehnle RE: Handling of -all, Stuart D. Gathman Re: Handling of -all, Alex van den Bogaerdt RE: Handling of -all, Julian Mehnle RE: Handling of -all, Stuart D. Gathman Re: Handling of -all, Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: Handling of -all, David MacQuigg Re: Handling of -all, rogerk Re: Handling of -all, David MacQuigg RE: Handling of -all, Guy RE: Handling of -all, Julian Mehnle <= RE: Handling of -all, David MacQuigg RE: Handling of -all, rogerk RE: Handling of -all, David Woodhouse RE: Handling of -all, Stuart D. Gathman RE: Handling of -all, Julian Mehnle RE: Handling of -all, David MacQuigg RE: Handling of -all, paul RE: Handling of -all, Scott Kitterman RE: Handling of -all, paul RE: Handling of -all, Julian Mehnle

Previous by Date:	RE: Handling of -all, Guy
Next by Date:	RE: Handling of -all, rogerk
Previous by Thread:	RE: Handling of -all, Guy
Next by Thread:	RE: Handling of -all, David MacQuigg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]