Re: Re: the state of the web site updates and some discussion

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Julian Mehnle wrote:
>
>
> > Currently, there is no "better" website than
> > http://spf.pobox.com.
>
> If what you really want is <URL:http://spf.pobox.com/why.html>
> then <URL:http://purl.net/net/spf> is arguably "better".  It
> would be really better if one of you Coucil guys could sign-up
> at http://purl.net and send me the loginid.  I'd then add it
> as "maintainer" for this PURL.
>
> Applications could then hardwire this PURL in their code, and
> if the pobox-URL changes, the PURL could reflect this change
> without changing the application.  That's one of the ideas of
> "persistent URLs" in a nutshell.
I like the idea of a persistent URL as well, but I would suggest we 
first ask Meng if he's willing to delegate the spf.pobox.com to the SPF 
council.
Greetings,
Radu

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper!  http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

radu.vcf
Description: Vcard