spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: the state of the web site updates and some discussion

2005-03-02 14:03:03
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 06:05:36PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:

If what you really want is <URL:http://spf.pobox.com/why.html>
then <URL:http://purl.net/net/spf> is arguably "better".

Is there any advantage in using a redirecting url such as
http://purl.net/net/spf over temporarily redirecting another
name outside of the perl.net system, such as using
http://really-cool-spf-site-name.com/ ?

If there is no difference, then simply figuring out a good permanent
name now can mean we'd have an immediate resolution on the question
of what URL to put into error messages, even if the rest of the
website-related decisions take months.

 -Mark Shewmaker
  mark(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>