On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:33:42PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 20:00 +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:59:46AM +1000, Julian Lawrence wrote:
I'm relating e-mail and SIP because they both use
"?????(_at_)mydomain(_dot_)com". SPF
Then what about:
http://user:password(_at_)www(_dot_)example(_dot_)org
This one never existed, that is per RFC, the ftp variant does exist.
rfc 2396 updates 1738. I'm not sure if that means the "is not allowed"
is thereby canceled. The form most certainly existed, for proof see
your own reference to microsoft; also see current firefox. Existed and
allowed are two completely different things.
However, this was not the important part of my post.
You left out:
" Just be aware that "@" doesn't mean mailbox. "
which still stands.
Alex