Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:13:25PM -0500, wayne wrote:
Well, I guess I should probably do things out of my planned order...
First off, I would like to apologize for my absence on spf-discuss. I
have not been totally absent from the SPF community, but most of what
I've done has either been on the #spf IRC channel, or behind the
scenes. For example, I've switched ISPs because the SPF-related
trusted-forwarder DNS whitelist was causing me to go over quota on my
old ISP. This caused a cascade of things that needed to be fixed, but
much of my time has been spent on family related matters, a project
that paid money, and a few non-SPF related projects.
Well, let's assume you missed a message or two about new
SPF adopters getting confused about the text presented to
them from the wizard:
"When you've put these records into your DNS, register at the SPF registry."
where "register at the SPF registry" points to a dead link.
Perhaps you could put spf.pobox.com on the top of the list of things to fix.
I know this has only been going on for a couple of months and I also
understand that new SPF adopters cannot be considered important, but
please do it anyway as I am afraid I'm becoming a bit sarcastic.
Likewise... I don't think another 6 months are needed to realize that
this "council" game isn't working.
Let's wrap it up.
All in favour, raise your hand.
Radu.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature