william(at)elan.net wrote:
Author/Change controller: IETF
Related Information:
Requesting SPF Council review of any proposed changes and
additions to this field is recommended. For information
about SPF Council see http://spf.mehnle.net/
As soon as this baby is on IETF standards track it's an IETF
standard, you can't have your cake and eat it too.
I've no problem with a more elaborated "related information"
in the registration form, but you can't _abuse_ it to change
the proper order of things. And Bruce _would_ ask about your
proposal. Maybe you all think that he's mad, but he's not.
<authoritative statement="free of charge" qualifier="<beg>" />
This political stuff is fascinating, sometimes it's necessary
to dance around it, otherwise you could catch a "last call"
comment like "but CRAM-MD5 is not secure" - ouch, that hurted.
Bye, Frank