In <200506061829(_dot_)21158(_dot_)bulk(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> Julian Mehnle
<bulk(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> writes:
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Add the "if a message is rejected" blurb with the proper DSN codes to
"PermError" (same style as TempError/SoftFail/Fail) - [sarcasm snipped]
The definition of TempError says:
| 2.5.6. TempError
|
| [...] If the message is rejected during the SMTP transaction for this
| reason, the software SHOULD use an SMTP reply code of 451 and, if
| supported, the 4.4.3 DSN code.
I agree that we should say the same (with s/451/550/, s/4.4.3/5.4.3/) for
PermError.
I strongly disagree. The that would make the implication that it is
ok to reject on PermError, which conflicts with mengwong-spf-* saying
that you MUST treat it the same as None. Are you also suggesting that
we publish DSN codes for None and Neutral also?
I am not comfortable about dropping the semantics of mengwong-spf-*,
but we had a vote on the council and I lost, so I updated the draft
accordingly. Now you want to go back and revisit the issue?
no.
-wayne