spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF

2005-06-24 04:35:45
* On Friday, 24.06.05 at 10:31 David Woodhouse <dwmw2(_at_)infradead(_dot_)org> 
had the temerity to say:

On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 16:50 -0500, wayne wrote:
The FTC is not interested in getting feedback about SPF, just
SenderID, CSV ('vaporware'), Domainkeys (on hold due to merger with
IIM), IIM (see DK), and BATV ('vaporware').

I am actively using both techniques which you misleadingly refer to as
'vaporware' and have been doing so for 6 months in the case of CSV; 16
months in the case of BATV.

I use both in an unmodified MTA with no need for external plugins --
perhaps the fact that you can do so and don't need external software has
confused you into considering them 'vaporware'?

Go chide Andy... he's the one that called them vaporware.

--
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper!  http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: pgp527E0yfYx1.pgp
Description: PGP signature