spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: possible changes to the SPF I-D during AUTH48

2005-08-14 16:48:52
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, wayne wrote:

But you aren't querying for a CNAME, you are querying for another
qtype.  When you query for, example, an A record that is found via a
bunch of CNAME lookups, you still get the A record from the resolver.
You also get the CNAMEs, but that's kind of beside the point.

You aren't guaranteed to get the final A record.  The resolver tries to
give you stuff you might need, and CNAME chains certainly qualify,
but it is on a best effort basis.  Having gotten an answer packet, the
A record - even if helpfully included - is not associated with the
original query name.  The application still has to start with the original
name and follow the chain - which may or may not terminate in that 
answer packet.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.