Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS (was: SPF implementations)

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:


However generally speaking they are good enough for use
on local LAN


Depends on the LAN!

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Re: SPF implementations, (continued) Re: Re: SPF implementations, Stuart D. Gathman Re: Re: SPF implementations, Jeremy Doupe Re: Re: SPF implementations, Stuart D. Gathman Re: Re: SPF implementations, Arjen de Korte Re: Re: SPF implementations, Stuart D. Gathman ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS (was: SPF implementations), Frank Ellermann Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS (was: SPF implementations), Tony Finch Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS (was: SPF implementations), william(at)elan.net Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Scott Kitterman Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, william(at)elan.net Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS (was: SPF implementations), Tony Finch <= Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Scott Kitterman Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, william(at)elan.net Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, william(at)elan.net Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Chris Haynes Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Dick St.Peters

Previous by Date:	Re: Re: SPF implementations, Stuart D. Gathman
Next by Date:	Re: Re: SPF implementations, Håkon Alstadheim
Previous by Thread:	Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, william(at)elan.net
Next by Thread:	Re: ESMTPA vs. ESMTPS, Frank Ellermann
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]