-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Shewmaker wrote:
Did you intend to delete the following wonderful paragraph?
| * MAIL FROM signature schemes such as BATV, SES, SRS, or VERP employ
| unique tokens in the MAIL FROM identity, but inherently do not
| change the PRA identities. These schemes make deliberate use of
| the protocol layer separation in internet mail, i.e. of the fact
| that the header identities are conceptually independent from the
| envelope identities.
I would request its restoration.
Yes, I deleted it because, as Wayne correctly noted, it only applies if
the SPF policy somehow relates to the localpart (where the unique token
is placed), which is rarely the case.
Do you think this case is prominent enough to warrant the valuable space
it takes up in the appeal?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDC6cwwL7PKlBZWjsRArEJAKDMqQQV88Kz/6cxGgD6/QRNF8MKpwCeI/Km
cwTZeFgYj5gbbGSieZtL8d4=
=lPX2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----