Julian is filing this appeal "on behalf of the spf project", which I
think is a quicker way of saying that he's filing it on behalf of the
spf council which represents the spf community.
So we're all more or less indirectly/implicitly represented in the appeal,
which brings up a question:
Would it be of any help to additionally be more explicit?
That is, would it help to also quickly ask for and put together a list
of people who support his appeal explicitly?
(I'll volunteer to request and compile a list of names if so.)
Does that make sense, or would that sort of thing detract from the clear
logic of his appeal?
(I also don't know the best logistics of doing this, and Julian, I don't
want to request adding a bunch of in-support-of signatures if you don't
want to do it either.)
However, if both the general consensus as well as Julian's opinion is
that this would be a good idea, I would suggest holding off on the
appeal's "send" button for a few days so as to be able to gather
signatures.
--
Mark Shewmaker
mark(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com