spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: Supporting the appeal

2005-08-25 13:34:35
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Kitterman [mailto:spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:34 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Supporting the appeal


Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:


We should expect Doug Otis and other SPF haters or Sender-ID
lovers to try to rip the appeal to shreds.


No, Doug hates SPF, but he also hates bogus PRA = MFROM ideas:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.mxcomp/5778
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.mxcomp/5779

Yes,

What Doug will say is that the issue is already hopelessly confused and
that we are right in our complaint, but wrong in our remedy.  He will
suggest that the only correct solution is to deprecate v=spf1 entirely
and have all Mail From checking be done only against SPF2.0 mfrom records.

It is a complete coincidence that this would erase the deployment lead
that SPF currently has over CSV.

Scott K

Well, Doug just weighed in and I'd say my estimate wasn't far off.

Scott K


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>