-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Shewmaker wrote:
That is, would it help to also quickly ask for and put together a list
of people who support his appeal explicitly?
[...]
However, if both the general consensus as well as Julian's opinion is
that this would be a good idea, I would suggest holding off on the
appeal's "send" button for a few days so as to be able to gather
signatures.
I think the importance of sending the appeal off ASAP (before Friday at
any cost) outweighs the benefit of having several supporting signatures.
If we can collect a few supporting signatures by 20:00 UTC today, I'll
include them.
What's even more important is that we all watch the "technical community"
lists (at least IETF <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> and MARID
<ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>) for
discussion of the appeal over the next few weeks, and are prepared to
refute any bogus arguments that are brought up. We should expect Doug
Otis and other SPF haters or Sender-ID lovers to try to rip the appeal to
shreds.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDC6kswL7PKlBZWjsRAtwdAJ9dxko/Ac/ky+7Mvco2lEd75Mx1/QCg2UZH
qLMyyi0zqzvCaoeElgql8RI=
=Q/Fc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----