Scott Kitterman wrote:
unecessary if you are using a shared secret mechanism.
With CRAM-MD5 a "man in the middle" could hijack the session.
That argument seriously hurt draft-hutzler-spamops in its
"IETF last call", and Bruce found some additional nits for
a coup de grace.
Waiting for a new draft: Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com