spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record

2005-10-31 09:50:58
On 10/29/2005 12:05 pm, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, wayne wrote:
This is incorrect.  The result should be "None" because there isn't a
TXT record that begins with "v=spf1 " (the space is important).

Currently, pyspf return PermError for a record that startswith("v=spf1"),
but contains no whitespace, and the empty record is accepted.  It is an
important (though picky) difference between PermError and None.

If I understand you, records with no whitespace (other than perhaps the
empty record) should be ignored instead.

Stuart,

Have you changed something?  The pySPF version I have up on the validator 
processes these correctly...

"v=spf1" - valid record (I think that's right)

"v=spf1" "mx" "ptr" "mx:servermail.portoeditora.pt" 
"mx:smtponi.portoeditora.pt" "mx:smtppt.portoeditora.pt"
"mx:newsletters.portoeditora.pt" "ip4:213.58.193.36" "ip4:194.65.106.36" 
"-all" - No valid SPF record identified

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>